托福考试改革后，新托福IBT考试的写作部分分为了综合写作和独立写作两个部分，而综合写作考试经常会成为中国考生眼中比较“难搞定”的部分。想要提高综合写作成绩在平时累积一些有用的素材非常必要。
新托福的综合写作分数可以说是由3部分决定的：1 阅读能力 2 听力能力 3 写作能力。
阅读能力基本上被中国考生忽略。因此是听力能力和写作能力是制约新托福考试的综合作文的关键因素。
除此之外，就是对于这个考试的熟悉程度，今天的这些素材，主要是解决这个问题的。很多考友们，对于新托福综合作文的写法，或者说侧重点不甚清晰。其实很简单，简单来说就是先写阅读为靶子，再写听力攻击之。听力多写，阅读少写，莫不如此。
因此接下来涉及的就是怎样去连接文章的问题，或者说如何把文章整合起来。下面的资料都是托福培训名师按照此理念搜集和整合起来的，而且一并奉上的还有搜集来的高分作文一篇，敬请笑纳^_^
观点的表达
think/ claim/discuss/say/ insist/ argue/ contend/ state/demonstrate / mention/ indicate / believe
hold the opinion that / hold the position that/ present the opinion that/ focus on sth,/ deal with sth./ concentrate on sth. / raise the issue that/ make the point that/ hold
According to the professor/
表达相反关系的词和短语
refute/challenge/doubt/deny/ rebut/contradict/ oppose/ jeopardize/ undermine
differ from/ cast doubt on/ object to/ disagree with/ depart from
be different from
be contradictory / conflicting/ opposing/contrary/ opposite to
In contrast/ on the contrary
The speaker makes the explanation seem less likely
表示相反的形容词
contradictory, different, conflicting, opposite.
表示观点的名词
viewpoint/ opinion/ idea/ argument/belief/standpoint
表示阅读文章的
reading passage/ writer/author, reading material, writing
听力文章的
listening/listening passage/ speaker/ lecture/ lecturer/talk/ listening material
一并附上的，还有高分范例作文一篇，供各位考友慢慢品评^_^
The reading states that assembling a group of people in a team is the best way to approach certain new projects. However, the professer’s lecture casts doubts on the reading by giving detailed examples about the penomena in a company.
The first doubt is that people in teams do not get what they deserve. According to the professor, there are “free riders” in every team and these people can still benefit from the recognition the team gets. In contrast, those who make real contributions are not recognized, as the success goes to the group as a whole. These differ from the reading’s statement, that is, members of the team usually have chances to be recognized as highly significant.
Another key point made by the professor is that teams do not move very quickly because they are hard to reach consensus, especially they need a lot of meetings to reach an agreement. Instead, the reading mentioned that, teams move quickly. To be specific, teams have wider range of knowledge, expertise and skills. These two points, if compared, are whole against each other.
Moreover, the professor argues that influencers are sometimes too influential over what the group do. The group may drop the plans which should be discussed deeper and turn to the so called “highly created” plans made by the influencers. Additionally, when these influencers make mistakes, the whole team is to be blamed.
In conclusion, the doubts casted above demonstrate that the reading’s opinion “teams are more risky and creative” is suspicious for us to believe according to the lecture of the professor.